I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders. You signed in with another tab or window. Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. Ventoy - Easy2Boot The problem of manjaro-kde-20.0-pre1-stable-staging-200406-linux56.iso in UEFI booting was an issue in ISO file , resolved on latest released ISO today : @FadeMind accomodate this. Openbsd is based. But Ventoy currently does. sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. You can repair the drive or replace it. This is definitely what you want. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. So thanks a ton, @steve6375! Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. . ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi Ventoy is open-source software that allows users to create ISO, WIM, IMG, VHS(x), and EFI files onto a bootable USB drive. @steve6375 Therefore, Ventoy/Grub should be altered as follows: Hopefully this shouldn't be too complex to add, though it may require some research, and modifying GRUB to do just that might require a lot of work. Sign in By default, secure boot is enabled since version 1.0.76. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. That's an improvement, I guess? This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. Thank you I found that on modern systems (those not needing legacy boot) that using the GPT boot partition version (UEFI) only is a lot more reliable. No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. Help a media that was created without using Ventoy) running in a Secure Boot environment, so if your point is that because Ventoy uses a means to inject content that Microsoft has chosen not to secure, it makes the whole point of checking Secure Boot useless, then that reasoning logically also applies to official unmodified retail Windows ISOs, because you might as well tell everyone who created a Windows installation media (using the MCT for instance): "There's really no point in having Secure Boot enabled on your system, since someone can just create a Windows media with a malicious Windows\System32\winpeshl.exe payload to compromise your system at early boottime anyway" Again, if someone has Secure Boot enabled, and did not whitelist a third party UEFI bootloader themselves, then they will expect the system to warn them in that third party bootloader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of whether they did enrol a bootloader that chain loaded that third party bootloader.

Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Seating View, Franklin Nc Police Department Jobs, Hart Plaza, Detroit Festival Schedule 2022, Articles V