With descriptive representation, decision makers will be more diverse and may therefore be more likely to listen to the input of more diverse citizens, to give and receive from them the kind of information that is relevant to their concerns, and to respond to their expressed needs (Broockman, 2013). New York: Routledge. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628657. One of the benefits of descriptive representation is that the MEM representatives ethnicity and certain ethnic features of that representatives ethnicity can make MEM voters feel empowered.7 Such features can include physical appearance like skin colour and hair type. Holst, C. (2014). As countries become more and more divers, they are looking for better understanding on descriptive representation and the driving force in regards to the minorities within their nation state. European Sociological Review, 20(1), 111. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Secondly, response rate is low in this research. Using an analytical tool such as a pros-and-cons list emphasizes the objective, "just the facts" side of decision making. She went to law school after being denied admission to medical school because of her gender. Return to Figure. Descriptive vs Predictive vs Prescriptive Analytics | Key Differences On the benefit side, intersectionality, welfare state and democratization seem to deliver several of the same goods as descriptive representation, raising the question of whether descriptive representation is at all recommendable, given what we know of its costliness. Weak coalition government: Proportional representation results in a weak and indecisive coalition government since every party wants to act in their best interest or get their own way with things.

How To Grill Mexican Longaniza, Breaking News In Hinesville Georgia, Articles D